Will It Sequence? Hunting drug resistant bugs

Plus, why bowhead whales are stuck in a genetic bottleneck
03 May 2024
Presented by Will Tingle
Production by Will Tingle.

SEWAGE-TREATMENT

A sewage treatment plant

Share

In this month's edition of Naked Genetics: Why a genetic bottleneck created decades ago means some whales are in deep water; how wastewater is helping genetic sequencer track down deadly diseases; And, surf’s up! how one beach dwelling creature is shredding the gnar in order to find food...

In this episode

Whale

Bowhead whales in a genetic bottleneck
Shivani Shukla & Aylwyn Scally

The bowhead whale is the oldest living mammal in the world, with an estimated natural lifespan of 268 years. They live in and around the Arctic ocean, feeding off krill. And, like many whales in the 19th and 20th century, had its numbers decimated by commercial whaling, from an estimated 50,000 individuals, down to as low as 4000 individuals. Since the whaling moratorium, numbers have recovered up to around 10,000, but now there are concerns that the lingering effects of intense whaling are rearing their ugly bowhead.

Will - Now I promise that this one wasn't even my suggestion. So Aylwyn, why, if we've stopped wailing and have done since 1986 for the most part, are populations thought to be declining again.

Aylwyn - They may be declining or going up or down for all kinds of reasons. One of the main factors that is thought to affect populations in the wild is climate change and arctic environments are very susceptible to climate change, more so than others. And the concern is about what might happen in the future rather than necessarily what's happened since whaling, since I think it's generally been a good thing for the whales that we've stopped hunting them.

Will - And if that is the case, then if climate change is driving such dramatic shifts in the environment, you're going to need to be able to adapt pretty quickly and that might be a problem for bowhead whales going forward.

Aylwyn - Yeah, that's the thing. And that's the general kind of idea in conservation genetics. And, simply put, that's how different are two individuals typically when taken from the species or from a population. And if they're very similar to each other, that means there's less variance or less versions of a given gene in the population. And if some big change comes along and natural selection can only operate on versions that are already existing, by and large. If there's nothing there, if there's no material for it to work on, to adapt to that new environment or that change, well then there's a danger that the population declines and perhaps even goes extinct.

Will - And Shivani, given that this is in stark contrast to, say, a genetics study on humans where we can resort to stuff like the UK Biobank and have huge swathes of data we can trawl through. How do you go about sequencing a population of wild whales?

Shivani - First of all, you have to choose which whales you want to sequence. So in this case, they had the bowhead whale and the narwhal. These two species were great to sequence because they live in very similar habitats and one kind of underwent reduction in their population size because of a bottleneck event. In the Pliocene era, there was a supernova explosion. So their genetic diversity is fairly low right now, but that's for environmental causes. But on the other hand, the bow whales have low genetic diversity because of hunting. They have similar, essentially diversity levels, but different reasons for why that happened. But they're wild, so that makes it difficult to track them down and sequence. So what they did was they collected tissue samples from Inuit hunters who have been hunting various species of whale for thousands of years, and they took these tissue samples between 1982 and as early as 2020. So you have the tissue sample, you can extract the DNA, it undergoes DNA sequencing and you can compare heterogeneity between the DNA to work out genetic diversity in that animal.

Will - So was there any striking difference in the genetic diversity across this timeline?

Shivani - At present, the genetic diversity in both species is fairly similar, but the main difference is that whales live a very long time. So the narwhals live for a hundred years, but the bow whale lives for 200 years and that makes it very difficult for them to undergo genetic selection for favourable traits. When each generation lives so long and things are changing very quickly, the ice caps are melting, the temperature of their climates are changing rapidly. So that means bowhead whales are less adaptable because they're living essentially twice as long as narwhals. So even though currently the genetic diversity is both quite low, bowhead whales are in more danger essentially. So I think that's helpful for people who are kind of looking into conservation because it gives us an idea of which species need protection and why that's happening. Clearly for the case of the bowhead whales, it's because of this wailing that's been happening in the last few decades,

Will - Given that we stopped wailing in 1986, that's less than two generations of bowhead whales that have managed to be produced since then. It sounds like they're really in quite bad shape, aren't they/

Aylwyn - They certainly are by the looks of it in trouble. I don't know if they're formally classified as endangered.

Will - This is an interesting thing because of the whole bowhead whale, the group of things, there's four different species in total. On average they're least concerned. But I'm really concerned looking at this <laugh>

Aylwyn - <laugh>. Well, it's worth bearing in mind that the actual risk for a species of extinction comes from absolute low numbers. So low numbers of individuals. So there are species that can survive for a very long time and exist with relatively low genetic diversity. And there are others that have much higher genetic diversity. And a good example of that is also one familiar to us humans. Humans also have gone through a bottleneck in the past, say about 50,000 years ago. And as a result, our genetic diversity is relatively low compared to the reality that there are billions of us. We might be worried about human extinction, but not for the kind of reasons that we're worried about with the bowhead whale. So although humans aren't as low in diversity as the bowhead, nevertheless it's not a direct risk in itself just having low diversity. They're not going to sort of inbreed themselves to extinction. If we stop, if we continue to stop wailing and if we manage the population and try to protect them from the risks that they face, then they should recover their genetic diversity and the future should be bright for them. And that's the case for bowhead whales and other endangered species like mountain gorillas, which also have extremely small numbers and extremely low genetic diversity and others all around the world.

Will - Shivani raises an excellent point as well in that a study like this is super useful because it puts another perspective on what we need to conserve. Because if you just took it by raw numbers, you'd want to conserve certain things, but if you take it on risk of genetic diversity collapse, you would have to factor another thing. And maybe you'd realise that there are certain species out there that need more conservation than others.

Aylwyn - Yeah, well that's also where the politics do come in because it's not always clear what you should be working to conserve and what are the natural sort of units of conservation in a given species. Do you try to make sure that the group as a whole is preserved or do you focus within that on subgroups that have their own unique identity, and then how do you identify those? And so some of this particular study was devoted to actually within the narwhal in particular saying, well, actually maybe there are subgroups of the narwhal that have their own identity, their own genetic identity, and maybe we should designate them as separate units. And sometimes when that happens in a species or with a population, that means that there are new resources made available to do that. And perhaps even more money, although there isn't usually a lot of money going around for these kinds of things. So as a result, these things can become very political. And I remember being involved in a study one time where the conservationists were very keen to identify a new species of orangutan because that would change its status within the conservation system and within the government system in Indonesia, and therefore enable them to do a whole bunch of things that they wouldn't previously have been able to do. So there are a lot of different factors that are at play at once when you're trying to identify or trying to describe the genetic diversity of these species.

a wastewater treatment plant

Hunting antimicrobial resistance in wastewater
Courtney Gonzalez & Scott Kuersten, Illumina

Today I’m taking a step outside the office to get some fresh air. It’s a lovely spring day here, and I need no excuse to take a walk after the winter we’ve just had. Rubbish weather and, of course, the various winter illnesses. No-one likes being ill, and even some of the more ubiquitous illnesses can pack a punch. It’s not uncommon or particularly unreasonable to seek out a doctor and get a course of antibiotics. But, as I’m sure you well know, antimicrobial resistance, when a bacteria, fungi, virus or what have you becomes immune to classical treatments, is fast becoming a point of serious discussion.

Courtney - The latest estimates put that close to 5 million deaths annually, you know, attributed to drug resistant infections and that's projected to skyrocket over the next 30 years. And, you know, if we don't do anything about it you know, and on top of that antimicrobial resistance threatens, you know, animal health, the environment and food security, the economic equity within societies because it disproportionately impacts low-income countries.

Will - That’s Illumina’s Courtney Gonzalez painting a grim picture. So, how does Illumina’s genetic sequencing come into this? And why am I walking outside for seemingly no reason? Well, on this genetics programme, it’s time to talk about wastewater. That’s why I’m outside of one of Cambridge’s wastewater treatment plants, to really soak up the atmosphere. <Breathe in> hmmm.

Scott - Wastewater is everything that goes into your toilet and in through the sewage system and to the sewage treatment plants where the material is processed and cleaned up so that infectious diseases and other nasties don't get out into the environment. We looked at a variety of different sources of wastewater. So that can be things like a manhole in a city someplace. It could also be the wastewater coming directly out of, say, a dormitory at a university campus or a building of some sort. So, all of those different sources will have sort of like different concentrations of material. If it's a manhole cover that's, you know, servicing, let's say, you know, 50 to a hundred thousand people, then it's going to be a very different composition than something coming straight out of a building.

Will - That’s Illumina’s Scott Kuersten, and I’m now very aware that I’m standing near other people’s waste. I’m going back inside.

That’s better. So, why sift through wastewater? What secrets does it hold?

Courtney - Wastewater surveillance I think is done for, like Scott said, you know, three main reasons to monitor, track and screen. So yeah, you want to monitor for evidence of infection within a community, track trends in those infections within the community and screen for infections that could trigger like, you know, additional testing or mitigation measures.

Scott - My work in wastewater started out at the beginning of the pandemic for the detection of covid. It was a very convenient way to be able to non-invasively test a large number of people and track the presence or absence of covid in samples and what kind of strains that are in there.

Will - Since you do end up passing a lot of the microbes in your gut out when you do your business, monitoring wastewater is a passive, but very insightful cross section of the disease causing microbes found in a population. And amongst these nasty bugs are the aforementioned resistant ones.

Courtney - Agencies like the CDC and the World World Health Organization issue these sort of priority lists of microorganisms with drug resistance that are particularly threatening to human health. So things like methicillin resistant staph aureus or MRSA, for example. So since we're not actually isolating and growing these pathogens in a lab, we're just looking at the genetic sequences. We have to, you know, rely on the markers of drug resistance, so these antimicrobial resistance genes and variants and at the same time evidence of the bacteria that can carry those markers.

Will - So what was limiting about the previous methods of sequencing when it comes to tracking antimicrobial resistant species?

Courtney - Wastewater particularly is really interesting because as Scott mentioned, it is a really complex, or potentially a really complex sample type compared to say, you know, like a nasal swab from a sick patient where you might have at least some idea of what's likely to be in there, you know, like one or if you're unlucky, a couple respiratory pathogens, whereas a single wastewater sample can have genetic material from hundreds of bacteria, viruses, fungi, plasmids, antimicrobial resistance genes, all at really low concentration, which presents a, a challenge for a lot of technologies. So, you know, on one hand you, you kind of have PCR, which can enrich and pull out signal from these low concentrations, but you have to have an idea upfront what you're looking for, and it's maybe gonna be limited to 10 or 20 things, you know, in a typical multiplex PCR. And then on the other hand you have shotgun metagenomic sequencing, which can, you know, sequence everything in the sample. So it's hypothesis free, which is good for surveillance, but you're potentially gonna miss a lot because it's at that really low concentration.

Will - Multiplex PCR, where you amplify a select few sequences of DNA isn’t all that helpful because wastewater surveillance requires you to cast a very wide microbial net. And shotgun sequencing had a broader range of genetic material to identify, but often wastewater concentrations were too low. The old options were either a mile wide or an inch deep. But maybe a sweet spot could be found.

Scott - So in the lab with the nucleic acids, we convert those nucleic acids into libraries as we call them, DNA and or RNA libraries that will then go on to an Illumina sequencer and be sequenced. Part of those library preps. There are various ways that you can manipulate those library preps to, to benefit certain types of organisms. So for example, we do hybrid capture enrichment assays that fish out certain sequences out of the material and enrich them. So then we don't have to sequence nearly so many, and we can sequence a lot more samples out of that after the sequencing.

Courtney - So what we found in this study is that we have this sort of sweet spot of precision metagenomic sequencing, which like Scott said, includes this step where probes go in and hybrid capture targets of interest for hundreds of pathogens and thousands of AMR genes. So you get that sensitivity for low concentration targets, but you also get the breadth that you need to really see what's in the sample without knowing exactly what you're looking for upfront.

Scott - And by doing that kind of enrichment, you can also process far more samples than you could in the past for a lot cheaper cost. And that's, that's really key for this, this, this field is to keep the cost as low as we can so we can keep monitoring and, and checking different sites and sources of wastewater.

Will - So a cheaper, more precise means of tracking antimicrobial resistance in populations. And the lower cost means it can be deployed more often, which gives you greater resolution of data across, say, a year long time frame.

Scott - Yeah, exactly. And fact, at the beginning of the pandemic, I was on a paper that we were able to track variants over the course of time as well. So you can kind of see the viral evolution taking place over time.

Will - Indeed, it has already spotted times in which resistance to prescription drugs was rising in certain populations.

Courtney - Yes, actually in the pandemic there was a lot of speculation early on that the drug prescribing practices were, you know, nobody knew exactly what sick patients were coming in with. So they would be prescribed drugs just based on, you know, having a cold. And it turned out to be COD, which an antibiotic would not be the right thing to prescribe for that. And so you were seeing more resistance in the wastewater as a result of those drug prescribing practices.

Will - So with an eagle eye being placed on the particularly harmful microorganisms, what can actually be done with this data to reduce them as a problem?

Courtney - One thing we can do with AMR surveillance data in general is use it to inform empirical treatment decisions. So for example, you know, in the absence of surveillance data, physicians are going to rely on their own experience of what drugs do and don't work for say, a given bacterial infection. But if you know from surveillance data that 90% of those bacteria in your community are resistant to the first line drug, then you can potentially use a different drug and save lives. And especially in countries without, you know, a robust clinical surveillance network, I think wastewater surveillance has a lot of promise to fill that gap.

Scott - And at least for the infectious disease type fields, monitoring wastewater gives you a little bit of a headstart as they basically say that when you start seeing say COVID in, in a wastewater sample then it might mean that in three or four days then patients are gonna start showing up in the hospital with certain symptoms. So if you can get ahead of the curve a little bit and understand if some new infection is popping up in the population, then you can better inform hospitals about what to expect as far as symptoms or how to treat the patients.

Will - So it's an early warning system and it can show you what drugs might be more effective. Is there anything this can't do?

Scott - Cure the disease <laugh>

Courtney - <Laugh>

Will - Well, you can’t have everything. But a fascinating insight into the world of sequencing either way. Thanks very much to Illumina’s Courtney Gonzalez and Scott Kuersten. That certainly wasn’t a waste.

Wave

The snail that surfs

It’s a beautiful day here on the Atlantic shores of South Africa. Much better than that sewage plant, in any case. The nutrient rich waters around here play host to some of the most striking and impressive organisms on our planet. Great white sharks, humpback whales, seals, penguins, I could go on. All of that life, all of those natural processes will inevitably lead to a lot of… Waste. Not that kind of waste, we’re talking about something else this time. The dramatic predator prey interactions in these waters will inevitably produce detritus. Half eaten fish, even the odd whale carcass. With the right tidal forces, a very real beach like this one that I’m definitely on can become something of a buffet for scavengers. But in the world of scavenging, it’s very much first come first served, which is a problem if, for instance, you happen to be a snail.

Now obviously we’re not talking about your run of the mill garden snail that causes great heartache for my mum. The snail in question is Bullia digitalis, often known as the plough snail. It has another name too, but we’ll get to that. They’re a pretty common sight on the South African coast, growing to about 6 cm long. If you’d never seen one before, you’d be forgiven for thinking a shell had found its way on top of a flat jellyfish.

The point is, this snail is not particularly quick. Indeed, during low tide, the snail’s locomotion looks very similar to if you tried to swim breaststroke whilst tied up in a bin bag. Such is life when you only have one very wide foot. However, when the tide turns, so do the tables.

Bullia digitalis is a special snail. It took its singular foot and saw not crisis, but opportunity. Because this snail is a surfing snail.

If Bullia digitalis senses a delicious meal in the same direction that the tide is flowing, it rolls onto its side, hoists it foot up like a sail in alignment with the waves, and surfs along the sea floor towards its delicious meal.

Now it’s not quite smacking the lip of a quality nug, which are surfing terms that I’m definitely cool enough to understand, and sure it can only hang one, but it’s still very impressive. The only speed limit is the speed of the waves. This thing can fly past the scavenging competition, with crucially very little energy expenditure.

Once this gnarly gastropod has reached its dining spot, it uses a proboscis, because this snail is weird enough that only now am I getting to the bit where it has a straw, and sticks it into the carrion and sucks up the soft tissue. Delicious.

And the other advantage of having one massive sail foot? When the tide starts to go out, Bullia digitalis can just plant the foot in the sand and stop itself from being pulled out to sea.

The fact that a snail the size of a drink’s can has the wherewithal to understand that tidal forces can carry it to food is remarkable, and long may this creature continue to shred the gnar.

Comments

Add a comment